Convention as the Enemy of Invention

I know I’m not 22. I’ve known that for the past 44 years.

I know I don’t have a conventional professional background, having changed careers six times, and earned two advanced graduate degrees, including a law-degree in an accelerated 2-year program at 35 years old, as the father of a young son. In fact, my son, then 7, was the youngest person ever to sit through the “Seven Dirty Words Case” in a  Constitutional Law Class.

I’ve written Haiku, plays, screenplays and essays;  high-level speeches, law review articles,  children’s stories about lop-sided pumpkins and policy papers. I’ve run multi-million dollar organizations and less than profitable non-profits.  I’ve taken chances on hiring a dramatically diverse array of talented people, giving many a shot to prove themselves.  Conventionality repelled me.

And, I know that to some Millenials, it’s a little odd for someone my age to still be seeking new, creative opportunities with a sense of urgency, when their perception of us– NOT reality–  is that we should be shuffling our feet behind a walker or playing shuffleboard.

What rankles me are not my wrinkles, but being stigmatized as “unconventional” as if it were on a par with incontinence. After watching my father get ground down by a conventional blue-collar job as a maintenance worker for nearly 40 years, I grew up knowing that I wanted my life to be anything BUT conventional.   And, while I did work for some pretty “conventional” institutions—non-profit organizations, unions, government, and medical centers—I managed to carve out a career over 4 decades which, while on a seemingly seamless trajectory of public education, public service, public health & non-profit leadership, scares the shorts off of people less than half-my age who view “difference” as a quaint disease.

What’s particularly ironic is that it’s coming from alleged “ disrupters”, who preach–if you buy their hype and survive their Skyped pitches–that convention is the enemy of invention.    On several occasions, I’ve been told by heads of organizations, headhunters, and Human Resource robots, that my background is, while tremendously impressive (blah, blah, blah), was TOO “unconventional” for them.   Exasperated, I finally turn off my interview charm, despite frantic hand-signals from my spouse to turn on my I-phone’s mute button.

Like a gattling-gun with a trigger that became unjammed, I pummel  the interviewer, pointing out that conventional personnel fits were dull and boring. Having done consulting for big and small organizations, I’ve frequently advised them that those that follow a narrow selection criteria in hiring end up losing to their competitors.

“Yes,” the patronizing response is,” but for this position we are looking for someone who’s followed a more traditional path of leadership.”   Suddenly, my years of working for Mario Cuomo and watching him make mincemeat out of morons, takes hold of me.

I reminded the interviewer that she sought me out because of my background and experience. And, not to leave a point of logic unpointed to, I noted that her new boss, also half my age, had absolutely no background nor training in the field.

Ah, but he wasn’t both “old” and “confrontational”, I could hear the sound of her smug silence saying. “Confrontational” is what you get tagged when you merely point out inconsistencies and foolish gibberish in other people’s words or actions. Unconventional might be tolerated, but only if its combined with being non confrontational, and young. This organization was looking for a leader with a lobotomy.

I could argue that a not-so-subtle form of ageism was being used against me, especially since I’ve spent years working against the conventional notion of retirement—a few of them recruiting skilled professionals with Math/Science backgrounds to teach Math & Science in underserved public schools.

But ageism, like many other acts of cowardice, comes with a smile and a shoeshine in sunny, stress-less companies around the country, especially when the object of the smirking scorn is over 60. “Unconventional” becomes a euphemism for “uncontrollable,” and accomplishments, while praised, would be perfect for the “type of employee” the organization is looking for, if only there weren’t an older human being attached to them, with a brain able to process thoughts, as well as tweets.

Fortunately, unconventionality has been the inspiration for quite a few folks, from Steve Jobs to Bob Dylan, Elon Musk to Bill Gates, and Walt Whitman to Tyrus Wong.  Still more,  inspiration comes from Paul Simon, Francis Ford Coppola and my son, who have taught me that, sure, they could always be “successful to the outside world but not successful to themselves,” if they kept doing the same thing, as Jobs once told Fortune Magazine.

“That’s the moment than an artist really decides who he or she is,” Apple’s founder said. “If they keep on risking failure, they’re still artists.”


One thought on “Convention as the Enemy of Invention

  1. Dear Mr. Villano:

    Thank you for contacting AARP, your connection to Real Possibilities for living your best life, about age discrimination.

    Unfortunately, in spite of passage of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967, age discrimination remains widespread more than four decades later. In a 2013 survey of workers between the ages of 45 and 74, AARP found that about two-thirds of people over age 50 say they have seen or experienced age discrimination in the workplace, and about one-quarter have personally faced age discrimination..

    AARP is strongly committed to eradicating discrimination in hiring, termination, compensation, and access to training and promotion opportunities. No one should be denied a job, laid off or passed over for opportunities solely because of their age. AARP’s campaign against age discrimination in employment is multi-pronged:

    Our advocates at the state and national levels work to enact and protect strong prohibitions against age discrimination. AARP has been leading the charge for passage of the bipartisan “Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act.” It is designed to remedy flawed U.S. Supreme Court decisions that make it far more difficult for older workers to prove claims of illegal bias based on age.
    AARP also works to ensure tough enforcement of the law, by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and in the courts. AARP Foundation litigators advocate through the courts (both federal and state) on behalf of older Americans.
    AARP works with the employer community to promote the value of older workers, making the case that employers should be alert to the pool of experience and wisdom they drain from their companies when they practice age discrimination.
    AARP has also recently partnered with LinkedIn to create “Life Reimagined for Work,” a job-search site connecting older jobseekers to employers that have committed to consider older applicants without regard to age.
    To learn more about the protections of the ADEA and how to file a complaint against an employer, we invite you to visit our website and review our Age Discrimination Fact Sheet at You may also be interested in reviewing our free publication “Affected by Age Discrimination? Here’s What to Know,” Stock Number D20015. To order, call us toll-free at 1-888-OUR-AARP (1-888-687-2277). You can also find it on our web site at

    Finally, you will also want to visit the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s website at or call1-800-669-4000. If you wish to file a complaint with the Equal Opportunity Commission, act promptly, as you will be facing a filing deadline as short as 180 days.

    Thank you again for contacting AARP about this important issue. I hope this information is helpful. If there is anything I can assist you with in the future, please do not hesitate to contact me. Together, we’re all about real possibilities.


    Victim of Age Discrimination? Know the Facts – AARP

    Chat Conversation End

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *